Review



hepg2 human hepatic cancer cells  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    ATCC hepg2 human hepatic cancer cells
    Uptake of SKBR-3-derived EVs by human epithelial cell lines. (A) Quantification of EV uptake following 2 h incubation of SKBR-3-derived mNG-labeled EVs with SKBR-3, HEK293T, Caco-2, PDAK, <t>HepG2,</t> and Huh7 cells at EV concentrations of 1 × 10 8 , 1 × 10 9 , and 1 × 10 10 particles. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel A. (C) Quantification of EV uptake following 4 h incubation at the indicated concentrations. (D) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel C. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.
    Hepg2 Human Hepatic Cancer Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 29817 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+hepatic+hepg2+cells/Hep+G2/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__05__19__726167-33-15-42
    Average 99 stars, based on 29817 article reviews
    hepg2 human hepatic cancer cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Cell Type–Dependent Uptake of Extracellular Vesicles Independent of Cellular Origin"

    Article Title: Cell Type–Dependent Uptake of Extracellular Vesicles Independent of Cellular Origin

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.64898/2026.05.19.726167

    Uptake of SKBR-3-derived EVs by human epithelial cell lines. (A) Quantification of EV uptake following 2 h incubation of SKBR-3-derived mNG-labeled EVs with SKBR-3, HEK293T, Caco-2, PDAK, HepG2, and Huh7 cells at EV concentrations of 1 × 10 8 , 1 × 10 9 , and 1 × 10 10 particles. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel A. (C) Quantification of EV uptake following 4 h incubation at the indicated concentrations. (D) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel C. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Uptake of SKBR-3-derived EVs by human epithelial cell lines. (A) Quantification of EV uptake following 2 h incubation of SKBR-3-derived mNG-labeled EVs with SKBR-3, HEK293T, Caco-2, PDAK, HepG2, and Huh7 cells at EV concentrations of 1 × 10 8 , 1 × 10 9 , and 1 × 10 10 particles. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel A. (C) Quantification of EV uptake following 4 h incubation at the indicated concentrations. (D) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel C. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.

    Techniques Used: Derivative Assay, Incubation, Labeling, Flow Cytometry

    Related Articles

    Modification:

    Article Title: Enediynyl peptides and iso-coumarinyl methyl sulfones as inhibitors of proprotein convertases PCSK8/SKI-1/S1P and PCSK4/PC4: Design, synthesis and biological evaluations.
    Article Snippet: The proprotein convertases PCSK8 and PCSK4 are, respectively, the 8th and 4th members of Ca-dependent serine endoprotease of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin Kexin (PCSK) super family structurally related to the bacterial subtilisin and yeast kexin.. The membrane bound PCSK8 (also called SKI-1 or S1P) is implicated in sterol regulation and lipid synthesis via its role in the maturation of human (h) SREBP-2.. It also plays role in cartilage formation, bone mineralization, as well as viral pathogenesis.

    Article Title: MicroRNA 33 Regulates Glucose Metabolism
    Article Snippet: .. Human hepatic HepG2 cells, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2% penicillin-streptomycin, and L-glutamine in 10- cm2 dishes at 37°C in 5% CO2. .. For gluconeogenesis induction, cells were grown in glucose-free DMEM (Cellgro) supplemented with 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 20 mM sodium lactate, and 2 mM sodium pyruvate in the presence of 100 nM dexamethasone (DXM) and 100 M 2=- O-dibutyryladenosine 3=-5=-monophosphate (Bt2-cAMP) or 1 M glucagon during 8 and 12 h. For some experiments, 100 nM insulin was added to the cells after 12 h of gluconeogenesis induction for 8 and 12 additional hours.

    Cell Culture:

    Article Title: Olive ( Olea europaea L.) Seed as New Source of Cholesterol-Lowering Bioactive Peptides: Elucidation of Their Mechanism of Action in HepG2 Cells and Their Trans-Epithelial Transport in Differentiated Caco-2 Cells
    Article Snippet: Both hydrolysates were ultrafiltrated with a 3 kDa cut-off Millipore UF System ultrafiltration membrane using optimized conditions (Sigma Aldrich, Milan, Italy) [ ]. .. Human intestinal Caco-2 cells INSERM (Paris, France) and human hepatic HepG2 cells (ATCC, HB-8065, ATCC from LGC Standards, Milan, Italy) were cultured in DMEM high glucose with stable L-glutamine, supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (complete growth medium). ..



    Similar Products

    99
    ATCC hepg2 human hepatic cancer cells
    Uptake of SKBR-3-derived EVs by human epithelial cell lines. (A) Quantification of EV uptake following 2 h incubation of SKBR-3-derived mNG-labeled EVs with SKBR-3, HEK293T, Caco-2, PDAK, <t>HepG2,</t> and Huh7 cells at EV concentrations of 1 × 10 8 , 1 × 10 9 , and 1 × 10 10 particles. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel A. (C) Quantification of EV uptake following 4 h incubation at the indicated concentrations. (D) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel C. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.
    Hepg2 Human Hepatic Cancer Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+hepatic+hepg2+cells/Hep+G2/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__05__19__726167-33-15-42
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hepg2 human hepatic cancer cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC human hepatic carcinoma hepg2 cells
    Uptake of SKBR-3-derived EVs by human epithelial cell lines. (A) Quantification of EV uptake following 2 h incubation of SKBR-3-derived mNG-labeled EVs with SKBR-3, HEK293T, Caco-2, PDAK, <t>HepG2,</t> and Huh7 cells at EV concentrations of 1 × 10 8 , 1 × 10 9 , and 1 × 10 10 particles. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel A. (C) Quantification of EV uptake following 4 h incubation at the indicated concentrations. (D) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel C. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.
    Human Hepatic Carcinoma Hepg2 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+hepatic+hepg2+cells/Hep+G2/pm42001994-58-0-14
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human hepatic carcinoma hepg2 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC human hepatic hepg2 cells
    Uptake of SKBR-3-derived EVs by human epithelial cell lines. (A) Quantification of EV uptake following 2 h incubation of SKBR-3-derived mNG-labeled EVs with SKBR-3, HEK293T, Caco-2, PDAK, <t>HepG2,</t> and Huh7 cells at EV concentrations of 1 × 10 8 , 1 × 10 9 , and 1 × 10 10 particles. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel A. (C) Quantification of EV uptake following 4 h incubation at the indicated concentrations. (D) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel C. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.
    Human Hepatic Hepg2 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+hepatic+hepg2+cells/Hep+G2/pm41687909-214-0-8
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human hepatic hepg2 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC human hepatic cell line hepg2
    Uptake of SKBR-3-derived EVs by human epithelial cell lines. (A) Quantification of EV uptake following 2 h incubation of SKBR-3-derived mNG-labeled EVs with SKBR-3, HEK293T, Caco-2, PDAK, <t>HepG2,</t> and Huh7 cells at EV concentrations of 1 × 10 8 , 1 × 10 9 , and 1 × 10 10 particles. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel A. (C) Quantification of EV uptake following 4 h incubation at the indicated concentrations. (D) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel C. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.
    Human Hepatic Cell Line Hepg2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+hepatic+hepg2+cells/Hep+G2/pmc12573415__RA-015-D5RA06637A-s001-12-8-13
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human hepatic cell line hepg2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC human hepatic carcinoma cells hepg2
    Uptake of SKBR-3-derived EVs by human epithelial cell lines. (A) Quantification of EV uptake following 2 h incubation of SKBR-3-derived mNG-labeled EVs with SKBR-3, HEK293T, Caco-2, PDAK, <t>HepG2,</t> and Huh7 cells at EV concentrations of 1 × 10 8 , 1 × 10 9 , and 1 × 10 10 particles. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel A. (C) Quantification of EV uptake following 4 h incubation at the indicated concentrations. (D) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel C. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.
    Human Hepatic Carcinoma Cells Hepg2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+hepatic+hepg2+cells/Hep+G2/pmc12440173-82-8-18
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human hepatic carcinoma cells hepg2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC hepg2 human hepatic cell line
    Preclinical evaluation of QUINOLAM on metabolic and cellular endpoints in <t>HepG2</t> cells. ( A ) Cell viability assessed by MTT assay after 24 h exposure to increasing concentrations of QUINOLAM (0.003 to 1.6 mg/mL). No cytotoxic effects were observed up to 1.6 mg/mL. SDS (1 mg/mL) was used as a positive control. ( B ) Glucose uptake measured using the 2-NBDG fluorescent analog following 24 h treatment with QUINOLAM at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL. A dose-dependent increase in glucose uptake was observed, with significant enhancement at 2.5 mg/mL ( p < 0.01 vs. control). ( C ) LDL receptor (LDL-R) protein expression determined by ELISA after 24 h exposure to QUINOLAM. Treatments with 1.0 and 2.5 mg/mL significantly upregulated LDL-R levels compared to untreated controls ( p < 0.05). ( D ) Antioxidant activity of QUINOLAM evaluated using the Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) assay. QUINOLAM displayed strong antioxidant potential in a dose-dependent manner, with significant increases in TEAC values at 0.1 and 0.2 mg/mL (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. control). All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.
    Hepg2 Human Hepatic Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+hepatic+hepg2+cells/Hep+G2/pmc12471573-89-8-13
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hepg2 human hepatic cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC human hepatic cancer cell line hepg2
    Fig. 1 Synthetic lethal CRISPR screening to identify potential cholesterol regulators in <t>HepG2</t> cells. A Immunoblot analysis of HMGCR in HepG2 cells undergoing CRISPR-mediated gene knockout with two independent sgRNAs (numbered as _1 and _2). Vector without specific sgRNA insert serves as a control. GAPDH serves as a loading control. B Immunoblot analysis of LDLR in HepG2 cells that have undergone CRISPR-mediated gene knockout with two independent sgRNAs. C The cell growth analysis of HepG2 cells after introducing indicated sgRNAs via lentiviral infection for 7 days. Cells were counted with a hemacytometer. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. D The relative cell viability was determined by CCK-8 assay for HepG2 cells expressing indicated sgRNAs and treated with indicated doses of lovastatin. Mean ± SD with n = 6. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. E The workflow of genome-scale synthetic lethal CRISPR screens (Screen 1) to identify negative GIs with HMGCR using its inhibitor lovastatin in HepG2 cells. F The scatter plot showing the β score of each gene and the correlation of both CRISPR screens (vehicle and lovastatin) in HepG2 cells. The genes in blue box are preferential targets as the synthetic lethal or negative GI hits. G The rank-ordered list of each gene in the CRISPR screens according to the strength of synthetic lethality measured by differential β scores between lovastatin and vehicle conditions. The top interesting gene hits are highlighted. H The top selected functional terms enriched among synthetic lethal hits of the CRISPR screens (Screen 1) as determined by the gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis
    Human Hepatic Cancer Cell Line Hepg2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+hepatic+hepg2+cells/Hep+G2/pm40098013-187-0-18
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human hepatic cancer cell line hepg2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    hep g2  (ATCC)
    99
    ATCC hep g2
    Fig. 1 Synthetic lethal CRISPR screening to identify potential cholesterol regulators in <t>HepG2</t> cells. A Immunoblot analysis of HMGCR in HepG2 cells undergoing CRISPR-mediated gene knockout with two independent sgRNAs (numbered as _1 and _2). Vector without specific sgRNA insert serves as a control. GAPDH serves as a loading control. B Immunoblot analysis of LDLR in HepG2 cells that have undergone CRISPR-mediated gene knockout with two independent sgRNAs. C The cell growth analysis of HepG2 cells after introducing indicated sgRNAs via lentiviral infection for 7 days. Cells were counted with a hemacytometer. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. D The relative cell viability was determined by CCK-8 assay for HepG2 cells expressing indicated sgRNAs and treated with indicated doses of lovastatin. Mean ± SD with n = 6. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. E The workflow of genome-scale synthetic lethal CRISPR screens (Screen 1) to identify negative GIs with HMGCR using its inhibitor lovastatin in HepG2 cells. F The scatter plot showing the β score of each gene and the correlation of both CRISPR screens (vehicle and lovastatin) in HepG2 cells. The genes in blue box are preferential targets as the synthetic lethal or negative GI hits. G The rank-ordered list of each gene in the CRISPR screens according to the strength of synthetic lethality measured by differential β scores between lovastatin and vehicle conditions. The top interesting gene hits are highlighted. H The top selected functional terms enriched among synthetic lethal hits of the CRISPR screens (Screen 1) as determined by the gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis
    Hep G2, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/human+hepatic+hepg2+cells/Hep+G2/custom%40hb-8065%4040069324
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    hep g2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Uptake of SKBR-3-derived EVs by human epithelial cell lines. (A) Quantification of EV uptake following 2 h incubation of SKBR-3-derived mNG-labeled EVs with SKBR-3, HEK293T, Caco-2, PDAK, HepG2, and Huh7 cells at EV concentrations of 1 × 10 8 , 1 × 10 9 , and 1 × 10 10 particles. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel A. (C) Quantification of EV uptake following 4 h incubation at the indicated concentrations. (D) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel C. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Cell Type–Dependent Uptake of Extracellular Vesicles Independent of Cellular Origin

    doi: 10.64898/2026.05.19.726167

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Uptake of SKBR-3-derived EVs by human epithelial cell lines. (A) Quantification of EV uptake following 2 h incubation of SKBR-3-derived mNG-labeled EVs with SKBR-3, HEK293T, Caco-2, PDAK, HepG2, and Huh7 cells at EV concentrations of 1 × 10 8 , 1 × 10 9 , and 1 × 10 10 particles. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel A. (C) Quantification of EV uptake following 4 h incubation at the indicated concentrations. (D) Representative flow cytometry plots corresponding to panel C. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 independent experiments). Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: Human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T), SKBR-3 human breast cancer cells, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAK) cells, HepG2 human hepatic cancer cells, Huh7 human hepatocellular carcinoma cells, Caco-2 human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells, and the murine melanoma cell lines B16F10 and Yummer (all obtained from ATCC) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic solution.

    Techniques: Derivative Assay, Incubation, Labeling, Flow Cytometry

    Preclinical evaluation of QUINOLAM on metabolic and cellular endpoints in HepG2 cells. ( A ) Cell viability assessed by MTT assay after 24 h exposure to increasing concentrations of QUINOLAM (0.003 to 1.6 mg/mL). No cytotoxic effects were observed up to 1.6 mg/mL. SDS (1 mg/mL) was used as a positive control. ( B ) Glucose uptake measured using the 2-NBDG fluorescent analog following 24 h treatment with QUINOLAM at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL. A dose-dependent increase in glucose uptake was observed, with significant enhancement at 2.5 mg/mL ( p < 0.01 vs. control). ( C ) LDL receptor (LDL-R) protein expression determined by ELISA after 24 h exposure to QUINOLAM. Treatments with 1.0 and 2.5 mg/mL significantly upregulated LDL-R levels compared to untreated controls ( p < 0.05). ( D ) Antioxidant activity of QUINOLAM evaluated using the Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) assay. QUINOLAM displayed strong antioxidant potential in a dose-dependent manner, with significant increases in TEAC values at 0.1 and 0.2 mg/mL (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. control). All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.

    Journal: Medicina

    Article Title: Retrospective Analysis of a Quince, Olive Leaf, and Amaranth Nutraceutical in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome

    doi: 10.3390/medicina61091638

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Preclinical evaluation of QUINOLAM on metabolic and cellular endpoints in HepG2 cells. ( A ) Cell viability assessed by MTT assay after 24 h exposure to increasing concentrations of QUINOLAM (0.003 to 1.6 mg/mL). No cytotoxic effects were observed up to 1.6 mg/mL. SDS (1 mg/mL) was used as a positive control. ( B ) Glucose uptake measured using the 2-NBDG fluorescent analog following 24 h treatment with QUINOLAM at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.5 mg/mL. A dose-dependent increase in glucose uptake was observed, with significant enhancement at 2.5 mg/mL ( p < 0.01 vs. control). ( C ) LDL receptor (LDL-R) protein expression determined by ELISA after 24 h exposure to QUINOLAM. Treatments with 1.0 and 2.5 mg/mL significantly upregulated LDL-R levels compared to untreated controls ( p < 0.05). ( D ) Antioxidant activity of QUINOLAM evaluated using the Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC) assay. QUINOLAM displayed strong antioxidant potential in a dose-dependent manner, with significant increases in TEAC values at 0.1 and 0.2 mg/mL (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs. control). All data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: All in vitro experiments were conducted using the HepG2 human hepatic cell line (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA).

    Techniques: MTT Assay, Positive Control, Control, Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Antioxidant Activity Assay, Standard Deviation

    Fig. 1 Synthetic lethal CRISPR screening to identify potential cholesterol regulators in HepG2 cells. A Immunoblot analysis of HMGCR in HepG2 cells undergoing CRISPR-mediated gene knockout with two independent sgRNAs (numbered as _1 and _2). Vector without specific sgRNA insert serves as a control. GAPDH serves as a loading control. B Immunoblot analysis of LDLR in HepG2 cells that have undergone CRISPR-mediated gene knockout with two independent sgRNAs. C The cell growth analysis of HepG2 cells after introducing indicated sgRNAs via lentiviral infection for 7 days. Cells were counted with a hemacytometer. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. D The relative cell viability was determined by CCK-8 assay for HepG2 cells expressing indicated sgRNAs and treated with indicated doses of lovastatin. Mean ± SD with n = 6. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. E The workflow of genome-scale synthetic lethal CRISPR screens (Screen 1) to identify negative GIs with HMGCR using its inhibitor lovastatin in HepG2 cells. F The scatter plot showing the β score of each gene and the correlation of both CRISPR screens (vehicle and lovastatin) in HepG2 cells. The genes in blue box are preferential targets as the synthetic lethal or negative GI hits. G The rank-ordered list of each gene in the CRISPR screens according to the strength of synthetic lethality measured by differential β scores between lovastatin and vehicle conditions. The top interesting gene hits are highlighted. H The top selected functional terms enriched among synthetic lethal hits of the CRISPR screens (Screen 1) as determined by the gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis

    Journal: Genome biology

    Article Title: Systematic interrogation of functional genes underlying cholesterol and lipid homeostasis.

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03531-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1 Synthetic lethal CRISPR screening to identify potential cholesterol regulators in HepG2 cells. A Immunoblot analysis of HMGCR in HepG2 cells undergoing CRISPR-mediated gene knockout with two independent sgRNAs (numbered as _1 and _2). Vector without specific sgRNA insert serves as a control. GAPDH serves as a loading control. B Immunoblot analysis of LDLR in HepG2 cells that have undergone CRISPR-mediated gene knockout with two independent sgRNAs. C The cell growth analysis of HepG2 cells after introducing indicated sgRNAs via lentiviral infection for 7 days. Cells were counted with a hemacytometer. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. D The relative cell viability was determined by CCK-8 assay for HepG2 cells expressing indicated sgRNAs and treated with indicated doses of lovastatin. Mean ± SD with n = 6. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. E The workflow of genome-scale synthetic lethal CRISPR screens (Screen 1) to identify negative GIs with HMGCR using its inhibitor lovastatin in HepG2 cells. F The scatter plot showing the β score of each gene and the correlation of both CRISPR screens (vehicle and lovastatin) in HepG2 cells. The genes in blue box are preferential targets as the synthetic lethal or negative GI hits. G The rank-ordered list of each gene in the CRISPR screens according to the strength of synthetic lethality measured by differential β scores between lovastatin and vehicle conditions. The top interesting gene hits are highlighted. H The top selected functional terms enriched among synthetic lethal hits of the CRISPR screens (Screen 1) as determined by the gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis

    Article Snippet: Human hepatic cancer cell line HepG2, cervix cancer cell line HeLa, and HEK293FT cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: CRISPR, Western Blot, Gene Knockout, Plasmid Preparation, Control, Infection, CCK-8 Assay, Expressing, Functional Assay

    Fig. 3 Identification of potential cholesterol regulators at the transcriptional level. A Venn diagram showing the overlap of up- or down-regulated DEGs of HepG2 cells upon LDLR KO, HMGCR, or double KO (DKO) determined by RNA-seq analysis. B Heatmap showing the DEGs across different samples of HepG2 cells. C Volcano plot showing the DEGs in DKO cells compared to control HepG2 cells with several typical genes highlighted. D The top five enriched functional terms for either up-regulated or down-regulated DEGs in DKO cells compared to control HepG2 cells by GO and KEGG analysis. E Venn diagram showing the overlap of DEGs between sterol deprivation condition (sterol depleted vs. normal) and SREBF2 KO under sterol deprivation (SREBF2 KO vs. vector control) in HepG2 cells. F Heatmap showing the DEGs across indicated samples of HepG2 cells. G Volcano plot showing the DEGs between sterol deprivation and normal conditions of HepG2 cells with several representative genes highlighted. H Volcano plot showing the DEGs in SREBF2 KO cells compared to vector control HepG2 cells in sterol deprivation condition with several representative genes highlighted. I Venn diagram showing the overlap of DEGs for indicated comparison groups. J Heatmap showing the expression change of representative DEGs that were shared between at least three comparison groups of I

    Journal: Genome biology

    Article Title: Systematic interrogation of functional genes underlying cholesterol and lipid homeostasis.

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03531-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 3 Identification of potential cholesterol regulators at the transcriptional level. A Venn diagram showing the overlap of up- or down-regulated DEGs of HepG2 cells upon LDLR KO, HMGCR, or double KO (DKO) determined by RNA-seq analysis. B Heatmap showing the DEGs across different samples of HepG2 cells. C Volcano plot showing the DEGs in DKO cells compared to control HepG2 cells with several typical genes highlighted. D The top five enriched functional terms for either up-regulated or down-regulated DEGs in DKO cells compared to control HepG2 cells by GO and KEGG analysis. E Venn diagram showing the overlap of DEGs between sterol deprivation condition (sterol depleted vs. normal) and SREBF2 KO under sterol deprivation (SREBF2 KO vs. vector control) in HepG2 cells. F Heatmap showing the DEGs across indicated samples of HepG2 cells. G Volcano plot showing the DEGs between sterol deprivation and normal conditions of HepG2 cells with several representative genes highlighted. H Volcano plot showing the DEGs in SREBF2 KO cells compared to vector control HepG2 cells in sterol deprivation condition with several representative genes highlighted. I Venn diagram showing the overlap of DEGs for indicated comparison groups. J Heatmap showing the expression change of representative DEGs that were shared between at least three comparison groups of I

    Article Snippet: Human hepatic cancer cell line HepG2, cervix cancer cell line HeLa, and HEK293FT cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Control, Functional Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Comparison, Expressing

    Fig. 4 Integrative multi-omics analysis to pinpoint key cholesterol regulators. A Heatmap showing the differentially expressed proteins in LDLR/HMGCR DKO cells compared to Vector control HepG2 cells determined by mass spectrometry-based proteomics profiling. The number of up- or down-regulated proteins is indicated along the heatmap. B Venn diagram showing the overlap of either up-regulated or down-regulated genes in LDLR/HMGCR DKO cells compared to Vector control HepG2 cells between RNA-seq and proteomics analysis. C Volcano plot showing the differentially expressed proteins in LDLR/HMGCR DKO cells compared to control HepG2 cells with several typical proteins highlighted. D The top ten enriched functional terms for up-regulated proteins in LDLR/HMGCR DKO cells compared to control HepG2 cells by GO and KEGG analysis. E The analytic scheme of human genes associated with lipid disorders or cardiovascular diseases. HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; CAD: coronary artery disease. F Venn diagram showing the overlap of potential cholesterol or lipid regulators between different angles including synthetic lethal CRISPR screens (Screen 1–3), DEGs in RNA-seq analysis (DKO vs. vector in HepG2 and HeLa cells, sterol depleted vs normal, and SREBF2 KO vs vector), differentially expressed proteins in proteomics analysis (DKO vs. vector in HepG2 cells), and the compiled list of human genes with variants related to lipid disorders or related diseases. The genes of indicated intersections are highlighted

    Journal: Genome biology

    Article Title: Systematic interrogation of functional genes underlying cholesterol and lipid homeostasis.

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03531-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 4 Integrative multi-omics analysis to pinpoint key cholesterol regulators. A Heatmap showing the differentially expressed proteins in LDLR/HMGCR DKO cells compared to Vector control HepG2 cells determined by mass spectrometry-based proteomics profiling. The number of up- or down-regulated proteins is indicated along the heatmap. B Venn diagram showing the overlap of either up-regulated or down-regulated genes in LDLR/HMGCR DKO cells compared to Vector control HepG2 cells between RNA-seq and proteomics analysis. C Volcano plot showing the differentially expressed proteins in LDLR/HMGCR DKO cells compared to control HepG2 cells with several typical proteins highlighted. D The top ten enriched functional terms for up-regulated proteins in LDLR/HMGCR DKO cells compared to control HepG2 cells by GO and KEGG analysis. E The analytic scheme of human genes associated with lipid disorders or cardiovascular diseases. HDL: high-density lipoprotein; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; VLDL: very low-density lipoprotein; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; CAD: coronary artery disease. F Venn diagram showing the overlap of potential cholesterol or lipid regulators between different angles including synthetic lethal CRISPR screens (Screen 1–3), DEGs in RNA-seq analysis (DKO vs. vector in HepG2 and HeLa cells, sterol depleted vs normal, and SREBF2 KO vs vector), differentially expressed proteins in proteomics analysis (DKO vs. vector in HepG2 cells), and the compiled list of human genes with variants related to lipid disorders or related diseases. The genes of indicated intersections are highlighted

    Article Snippet: Human hepatic cancer cell line HepG2, cervix cancer cell line HeLa, and HEK293FT cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Plasmid Preparation, Control, Mass Spectrometry, RNA Sequencing, Functional Assay, CRISPR

    Fig. 5 Functions of GGT7 during cholesterol and lipid homeostasis. A RNA expression analysis of indicated genes by RT-qPCR in HepG2 cells upon LDLR KO, HMGCR KO, or LDLR/HMGCR DKO. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test, compared to Vector control, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. B RNA expression analysis of indicated genes by RT-qPCR in HepG2 cells upon SREBF2 KO under sterol deprivation condition. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Unpaired two-sided t test, compared to vector control, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. C Immunoblot analysis of GGT7 in HepG2 cells undergoing CRISPR-mediated gene knockout with two independent sgRNAs. GAPDH serves as a loading control. D Decreased total cholesterol levels of HepG2 cells upon GGT7 KO using two independent sgRNAs. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Unpaired two-sided t test, compared to vector control, *p < 0.05. E Decreased sterol and other lipids upon GGT7 KO in HepG2 cells determined by untargeted metabolomic profiling. n = 6 biological replicates for each group

    Journal: Genome biology

    Article Title: Systematic interrogation of functional genes underlying cholesterol and lipid homeostasis.

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03531-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 5 Functions of GGT7 during cholesterol and lipid homeostasis. A RNA expression analysis of indicated genes by RT-qPCR in HepG2 cells upon LDLR KO, HMGCR KO, or LDLR/HMGCR DKO. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test, compared to Vector control, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. B RNA expression analysis of indicated genes by RT-qPCR in HepG2 cells upon SREBF2 KO under sterol deprivation condition. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Unpaired two-sided t test, compared to vector control, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. C Immunoblot analysis of GGT7 in HepG2 cells undergoing CRISPR-mediated gene knockout with two independent sgRNAs. GAPDH serves as a loading control. D Decreased total cholesterol levels of HepG2 cells upon GGT7 KO using two independent sgRNAs. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Unpaired two-sided t test, compared to vector control, *p < 0.05. E Decreased sterol and other lipids upon GGT7 KO in HepG2 cells determined by untargeted metabolomic profiling. n = 6 biological replicates for each group

    Article Snippet: Human hepatic cancer cell line HepG2, cervix cancer cell line HeLa, and HEK293FT cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: RNA Expression, Quantitative RT-PCR, Plasmid Preparation, Control, Western Blot, CRISPR, Gene Knockout

    Fig. 6 Mechanistic insights of GGT7 in regulating cholesterol metabolism. A RNA expression analysis of indicated genes by RT-qPCR in HepG2 cells upon GGT7 KO. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Unpaired two-sided t test, compared to Vector control, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. B RNA expression analysis of indicated genes by RT-qPCR in HepG2 cells upon GGT7 KO under normal or sterol deprivation conditions. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Unpaired two-sided t test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. C Volcano plot showing the DEGs in GGT7 KO cells compared to vector control HepG2 cells with several typical genes highlighted. The number of up- or down-regulated DEGs is indicated. D The top selected functional terms enriched for down-regulated DEGs in GGT7 KO cells compared to control HepG2 cells by GO and KEGG analysis. E Coomassie blue staining of SDS-PAGE gel with FLAG bead immunoprecipitated materials from vector control- or FLAG-GGT7-expressing HepG2 cells. The band position corresponding to GGT7 or MYH10 is indicated with an asterisk. F The top ten list of GGT7-interacting protein partners identified by mass spectrometry. G Immunoblot analysis of total cell lysis and immunoprecipitants (using IgG control, GGT7, or MYH10 antibody) for indicated proteins derived from HepG2 cells. H Immunoblot analysis of MYH10 in HepG2 cells that have undergone CRISPR-mediated gene knockout. GAPDH serves as a loading control. I Decreased total cholesterol levels of HepG2 cells upon MYH10 knockout. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Unpaired two-sided t test, compared to AAVS1 KO, *p < 0.05. Decreased Dil-LDL uptake by HepG2 cells upon J GGT7 or K MYH10 knockout. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Unpaired two-sided t test, compared to AAVS1 KO, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

    Journal: Genome biology

    Article Title: Systematic interrogation of functional genes underlying cholesterol and lipid homeostasis.

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03531-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 6 Mechanistic insights of GGT7 in regulating cholesterol metabolism. A RNA expression analysis of indicated genes by RT-qPCR in HepG2 cells upon GGT7 KO. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Unpaired two-sided t test, compared to Vector control, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. B RNA expression analysis of indicated genes by RT-qPCR in HepG2 cells upon GGT7 KO under normal or sterol deprivation conditions. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Unpaired two-sided t test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. C Volcano plot showing the DEGs in GGT7 KO cells compared to vector control HepG2 cells with several typical genes highlighted. The number of up- or down-regulated DEGs is indicated. D The top selected functional terms enriched for down-regulated DEGs in GGT7 KO cells compared to control HepG2 cells by GO and KEGG analysis. E Coomassie blue staining of SDS-PAGE gel with FLAG bead immunoprecipitated materials from vector control- or FLAG-GGT7-expressing HepG2 cells. The band position corresponding to GGT7 or MYH10 is indicated with an asterisk. F The top ten list of GGT7-interacting protein partners identified by mass spectrometry. G Immunoblot analysis of total cell lysis and immunoprecipitants (using IgG control, GGT7, or MYH10 antibody) for indicated proteins derived from HepG2 cells. H Immunoblot analysis of MYH10 in HepG2 cells that have undergone CRISPR-mediated gene knockout. GAPDH serves as a loading control. I Decreased total cholesterol levels of HepG2 cells upon MYH10 knockout. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Unpaired two-sided t test, compared to AAVS1 KO, *p < 0.05. Decreased Dil-LDL uptake by HepG2 cells upon J GGT7 or K MYH10 knockout. Mean ± SD with n = 3. Unpaired two-sided t test, compared to AAVS1 KO, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

    Article Snippet: Human hepatic cancer cell line HepG2, cervix cancer cell line HeLa, and HEK293FT cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: RNA Expression, Quantitative RT-PCR, Plasmid Preparation, Control, Functional Assay, Staining, SDS Page, Immunoprecipitation, Expressing, Mass Spectrometry, Western Blot, Lysis, Derivative Assay, CRISPR, Gene Knockout, Knock-Out

    Fig. 7 Impaired cholesterol and lipid homeostasis in Ggt7 knockout mice. A The construction strategy of whole-body Ggt7 KO mice using two sgRNAs targeting the flanks of exon 2 and exon 3 of Ggt7 in the mouse genome. B Immunoblot analysis of Ggt7 in different types of tissues derived from Ggt7+/+ and Ggt7−/− mice. β-actin serves as a loading control. C Body weight measurements for Ggt7+/+ and Ggt7−/− mice under normal diet (ND) (n = 12 and 10, respectively) or high-fat high cholesterol (HFHC) diet (n = 7 and 8, respectively). Unpaired two-sided t test, *p < 0.05, ns means not significant. D The serum total cholesterol levels (n = 12, 10, 7 and 8 for each group), E serum HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (n = 10, 10, 7 and 8), F serum LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (n = 11, 10, 7 and 8) and G serum triglycerides (TG) levels (n = 12, 10, 7 and 8) in Ggt7+/+ and Ggt7−/− mice fed with ND or HFHC diet. Unpaired two-sided t test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ns means not significant. H The total cholesterol (TC) levels (n = 12, 10, 7 and 7) or I TG levels (n = 12, 10, 7 and 8) in the livers of Ggt7+/+ or Ggt7−/− mice fed with ND or HFHC diet. Unpaired two-sided t test, ns means not significant. J The TC levels (n = 12, 10, 7, and 7) or K TG levels (n = 12, 10, 7, and 7) in the brain tissues of Ggt7+/+ or Ggt7−/− mice fed with ND or HFHC diet. Unpaired two-sided t test, **p < 0.01, ns means not significant. L Volcano plot showing the DEGs upon Ggt7 knockout in the mouse liver or brain tissues. The number of up- or down-regulated DEGs is indicated. M Venn diagram showing the overlap of DEGs between Ggt7 KO in mouse liver, Ggt7 KO in mouse brain, and GGT7 KO in HepG2 cells as determined by RNA-seq analysis. N The top five enriched functional terms for either up-regulated or down-regulated DEGs in the liver or brain tissues of Ggt7−/− mice vs. Ggt7+/+ mice

    Journal: Genome biology

    Article Title: Systematic interrogation of functional genes underlying cholesterol and lipid homeostasis.

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03531-8

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 7 Impaired cholesterol and lipid homeostasis in Ggt7 knockout mice. A The construction strategy of whole-body Ggt7 KO mice using two sgRNAs targeting the flanks of exon 2 and exon 3 of Ggt7 in the mouse genome. B Immunoblot analysis of Ggt7 in different types of tissues derived from Ggt7+/+ and Ggt7−/− mice. β-actin serves as a loading control. C Body weight measurements for Ggt7+/+ and Ggt7−/− mice under normal diet (ND) (n = 12 and 10, respectively) or high-fat high cholesterol (HFHC) diet (n = 7 and 8, respectively). Unpaired two-sided t test, *p < 0.05, ns means not significant. D The serum total cholesterol levels (n = 12, 10, 7 and 8 for each group), E serum HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (n = 10, 10, 7 and 8), F serum LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (n = 11, 10, 7 and 8) and G serum triglycerides (TG) levels (n = 12, 10, 7 and 8) in Ggt7+/+ and Ggt7−/− mice fed with ND or HFHC diet. Unpaired two-sided t test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ns means not significant. H The total cholesterol (TC) levels (n = 12, 10, 7 and 7) or I TG levels (n = 12, 10, 7 and 8) in the livers of Ggt7+/+ or Ggt7−/− mice fed with ND or HFHC diet. Unpaired two-sided t test, ns means not significant. J The TC levels (n = 12, 10, 7, and 7) or K TG levels (n = 12, 10, 7, and 7) in the brain tissues of Ggt7+/+ or Ggt7−/− mice fed with ND or HFHC diet. Unpaired two-sided t test, **p < 0.01, ns means not significant. L Volcano plot showing the DEGs upon Ggt7 knockout in the mouse liver or brain tissues. The number of up- or down-regulated DEGs is indicated. M Venn diagram showing the overlap of DEGs between Ggt7 KO in mouse liver, Ggt7 KO in mouse brain, and GGT7 KO in HepG2 cells as determined by RNA-seq analysis. N The top five enriched functional terms for either up-regulated or down-regulated DEGs in the liver or brain tissues of Ggt7−/− mice vs. Ggt7+/+ mice

    Article Snippet: Human hepatic cancer cell line HepG2, cervix cancer cell line HeLa, and HEK293FT cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).

    Techniques: Knock-Out, Western Blot, Derivative Assay, Control, RNA Sequencing, Functional Assay